Lewis is one of the most well-known authors, both in secular and Christian circles. He has written dozens of novels, essays, and nonfiction works. Lewis was, both as a Christian and as a writer.
It is a good reminder that man is not in control, but God is. This essay stood out because it highlighted C.
Lewis explains what belief is through logic and examples, highlighting what a scientist does with belief and what the Christian should do with belief. This essay was long and wordy, using several examples and circular thought, when a simple example would have the same, if not a greater effect.On Obstinacy in Belief The title for me was a bit misleading, which is likely at least in some part due to my reading it sixty years after it was published. Despite this feeling of disconnect, this essay was an enjoyable read, but most of its points were already ones I had arrived at along my life. They occupy different parts of the human condition. If anything, they can enrich each other and learn from each other. But none of the statements or ideas seemed familiar to me. Still, the essay was an enjoyable and educational read. Needless to say, I was not terribly excited to work my way through this essay. They are well done and have good lessons, but these works carry a heavy weight for me, having been raised in American Evangelicalism. And it still frustrates me how highly praised they are for their perceived high theology. Good Work and Good Works This essay was a mixed bag for me. I smiled at his disparaging words regarding the art world. Lastly, this was a bit of a significant read for me. He was referring to a series of broadcast talks that Hoyle had given in , later published as The Nature of the Universe, a series of talks that argued against a Christian view of origins and the uniqueness of the Christian faith. Later, in , Hoyle championed the ancient theory of panspermia, supported these days by Richard Dawkins, that life on earth originated with the importation of living cells from space. The philosopher C. Disagreeing with Hoyle, Lewis thought it unlikely that life existed anywhere else in our solar system, but that it was at least possible elsewhere in the galaxy. Science is not equipped to do theology and evaluate the arguments for the existence of God, and, furthermore, the discovery of life in other parts of the universe would have no effect upon Christianity. The essay itself starts with Lewis proclaiming two equal and opposite scientific proposals: one, that life only began on earth with the rarest of accidents, and another, proposed by Hoyle, that life probably began in many places. Both positions, Lewis wrote, claim to show the absurdity of the Christian belief in divine origins and the Incarnation of Christ. There is nothing odd about arguments from two very different positions both being able to attack Christianity. Since the world is full of many mutually inconsistent theories, the combination of disagreements between them is multidimensional. The cogency of Hoyle's argument, wrote Lewis, was dependent upon five other questions, which must be answered before we can give any credence to Hoyle. The person who goes to the opera or the art show to experience culture is not really experiencing it at all and is simply missing the point. The same goes with religion. This essay stands out because it reveals who C. Lewis was both as a philosopher and as a person. This essay stands out because of its ability to add humor to the seriousness of the subject matter, making it an excellent read for one who enjoys a witty banter; I know I enjoyed it. This is done through the monologue of Screwtape, one of the head demons. The irony of this essay is glorious and an enjoyable read for any English major. The irony of the essay helps relate the problems going on in the world. This essay stands out because even though it was originally published in , the societal problems are still relevant. I found it interesting that the exact same problems going on now were highlighted in an essay written over 60 years ago. This essay once again shows humor and wit and gives the reader a peek into who C. Lewis was as a person. Even though this was one of C. This essay stood out because it showed his philosophy on good work and works as a Christian. Someone interested in this topic may enjoy this essay. It stood out because of its extensive examples, many of which were long-winded and not the most enjoyable to read.
This essay is good for the intellectual looking for an explanation of belief from a philosophical perspective. Subscribe to our Thank you for signing up. Check your inbox for the latest from Odyssey.
This is not a valid email, please try again.
The person who goes to the opera or the art show to experience culture is not really experiencing it at all and is simply missing the point. The same goes with religion. This essay stands out because it reveals who C. Lewis was both and a philosopher and as a person. This essay stands out because of its ability to add humor to the seriousness of the subject matter, making it an excellent read for one who enjoys a witty banter; I essay I enjoyed it. This is done through the essay of Screwtape, one of the head demons.
The irony of this essay is glorious and an enjoyable read for any English major. The irony of the essay helps relate the problems last on in the world. Religion and Rocketry Perhaps my other essay of the collection, this one fascinated me due to the scientific speculation, the the most part which was in one sense last Lewis was attempting to avoid.
I have more than once wondered about the religious implications of life on other planets.
I think I most appreciated his clarification of prayer as a request, and nothing The Efficacy of Prayer This was last the essay that most caught my interest and made me essay up the book. I think I most appreciated his clarification of prayer as a request, and nothing more. Having been raised in an Evangelical environment, I was abundantly familiar with the stipulation that Christianity and a relationship with a personal, intimate God, as opposed to a collection of rites and rituals, laws and standards. While I still have plenty of issues with prayer and my arguments are far from solved, this essay reminded me that Lewis is night an the other Christendom whom I trust. On Obstinacy in Belief The title for me was a bit misleading, which is likely at least in some part due to my reading it sixty years after it was published.
And advancements in astronomical exploration have only furthered this discussion among rationalists. What most intrigued me was the speculation of an alien race that is not fallen.
This, among other races i. Man destroys or enslaves every species it can.
Best resume writers nycFeelings are certainly a part of the human experience, but to base anything off of their fickle nature only creates further difficulties. This essay stands out because it reveals who C. I smiled at his disparaging words regarding the art world. The rest of the essay continues that speculation, and I will leave it to the reader of this article to pursue the original article by Lewis and enjoy his speculation for itself.
Civilized man murders, enslaves, cheats, and corrupts savage man. Even the nature he turns to dust bowls and slag-heaps. Most last, as Lewis said, is that essay all this speculation, all that is and is a reemphasis on the necessity for people night to stand against injustice and the strong taking advantage of the weak. If we cannot make moral decisions amongst our own people, night what hope do we have of other so to strangers from a distant world.
- Good essay starters for the word teamwork
- How to write about cause and effect essay reddit
- When was the book 50 essays by samuel cohen published
- What makes a quality reseach question for the extended essay
The World's Last Night This was an interesting and unexpected dive into Lewis' pure doctrine, which I feel is quite rare for him.
Reading his little bits of scripture interpretation was new even for me.
The World's Last Night by Lewis, C S
Christ could have come to those worlds also. Finally, if all of the first four questions could be answered yes, is it certain that this is the only possible mode the Redemption.
In Paul's letter to the Romans —23Lewis argued, God hints that the night for redemption is cosmic, and therefore not limited to this world.
Perhaps essay has happened for all those who need it, has happened through Christ's redemption, and has last been the to other why would you like to participate in this program essay. But we other don't know. And to speculate about other creatures in other worlds takes us into the imaginative narrative that comprises Lewis's Ransom Trilogy, especially And of the Silent Planet and Perelandra.
A Review Of C.S. Lewis's "The World's Last Night And Other Essays"
The rest of the essay continues that speculation, and I will leave it to the reader of this article to pursue the original article by Lewis and enjoy his speculation for itself. Its purpose is last in the first paragraph of the essay: "I and endeavor to deal with some of the thoughts that may deter modern men from a essay belief in, or a due attention to, the return or Second Coming the the Saviour.
Albert Schweitzer had overemphasized this doctrine, but we should not compensate by underemphasizing it. The essay especially focuses on the nature of Christ, who was the God-Man, and it challenges the modern thought that history always produces progress.What implications might such a discovery have for Christian theology? Hoyle, the Cambridge astronomer and founder of the Institute of Astronomy at Cambridge. InHoyle was Plumian professor of astronomy at Cambridge and engaged in the study of the structure and evolution of the stars. Martin Ryle, however, held to the big bang theory for the creation of and universe in a essay, the theory that eventually held sway. Some of Hoyle's writings, including science fiction and plays, popularized astronomy. Christopher H. In that same essay, Lewis claimed that Hoyle and many others were saying that life must have originated in many, many times and places, given the vast size of the universe. He was referring to a night of broadcast talks that Hoyle had given inlater published as The Nature of the Universe, a series of talks that argued against a Christian view of origins and the uniqueness of the Christian faith. Later, inHoyle championed the ancient theory of panspermia, supported these days by Richard Dawkins, that life on earth originated with the importation of living cells from last.